← Back to tunr.sh

tunr vs LocalXpose

A side-by-side comparison of tunr and LocalXpose to help you choose the best localhost tunnel for your development workflow.

Feature tunr Recommended LocalXpose (Pro)
Monthly PriceFree / $12 Pro$8/month
Open Source CLIโœ“ Yesโœ• No
HTTP/HTTPS/WebSocketโœ“ Fullโœ“ Full
TCP / TLS Tunnelsโš ๏ธ Experimental (WebSocket only, no raw port)โœ“ Yes
Custom Subdomainsโœ“ Proโœ“ Yes
Custom Domainsโš ๏ธ Coming soonโš ๏ธ Subdomains + apex
BandwidthNo bandwidth cap ยท per-minute request limitsโœ“ Unlimited
Request Inspectionโœ“ Yesโœ“ Yes
Password Protectionโœ“ Basic Authโœ“ Yes
IP Whitelistingโœ“ Yes (HTTP tunnels)โœ“ Yes
Bearer Token Authโœ“ Yesโœ•
Header Modificationโœ“ Yesโœ•
QR Code Sharingโœ“ Yesโœ•
Freeze Mode (crash protection)โœ“ Exclusiveโœ•
Demo Mode (read-only)โœ“ Exclusiveโœ•
Feedback Widget Injectionโœ“ Exclusiveโœ•
Auto-Login Bypassโœ“ Yesโœ•
Auto-Expiring Tunnelsโœ“ Yes (TTL)โœ•
Path Routingโœ“ Yesโœ•
MCP / AI Integrationโœ“ Yesโœ•
Team Collaboration๐Ÿ”œ Plannedโœ•

Competitor features and prices change often; check their current plan pages. tunr's raw TCP/UDP/TLS tunnels are experimental and the relay terminates TLS, so no tunnel is end-to-end encrypted.

The Verdict

Both tools handle HTTP tunnels well, and LocalXpose Pro costs less than tunr Pro. LocalXpose gives you native TCP and TLS ports today; tunr's raw tunnels are experimental and only reachable over a WebSocket.

But tunr leans into developer experience: its CLI is open source, it has bearer token auth, header modification, QR codes, and most importantly โ€” vibecoder superpowers (freeze mode, demo mode, feedback widget injection) that LocalXpose simply doesn't have. For vibecoders, freelancers, and AI-assisted development โ€” tunr is the better fit.

Try the free tunnel

This page compares tunr's tunnel (tunr share). tunr's main product is now Agent Bridge: approved, read-only, audited access for AI agents to customers' on-prem data. Tunnels & deploy are still part of tunr.